Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
40346
Iris Technologies Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada
(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
---|---|---|
2024-12-05 | Appeal closed | |
2024-06-28 | Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties | |
2024-06-28 | Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties | |
2024-06-28 |
Judgment on the appeal rendered, Ka Côt Row Mar Kas Ja Ob, The appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-175-21, 2022 FCA 101, dated June 2, 2022, heard on November 9, 2023, is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
2023-11-20 |
Transcript received, Joint with 40276 93 pages |
|
2023-11-09 | Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow | |
2023-11-09 |
Hearing of the appeal, 2023-11-09, Ka Côt Row Mar Kas Ja Ob Judgment reserved |
|
2023-11-06 | Correspondence received from, Counsel for the Appellant request to reserved two (4) seats. | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-11-06 | Appellant's condensed book, (Book Form), (Printed version due on 2023-11-14) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-11-06 | Respondent's condensed book, (Book Form), (Printed version due on 2023-11-14) | Attorney General of Canada |
2023-11-06 | Correspondence received from, Counsel for the Respondent request to reserved two (2) seats | Attorney General of Canada |
2023-10-24 | Correspondence received from, Letter to re allocated time | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-10-17 |
Notice of appearance, Daniel Bourgeois, Christa Akey and Justine Malone will appear before the Court in person and Daniel Bourgeois will be presenting the oral argument. |
Attorney General of Canada |
2023-10-17 |
Notice of appearance, Leigh Somerville Taylor and Mireille Dahab will appear before the Court in person and Ms. Somerville Taylor will present oral argument. |
Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-08-08 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A-Factum | Attorney General of Canada |
2023-08-08 | Respondent's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-08-14, (Printed version filed on 2023-08-09) | Attorney General of Canada |
2023-08-08 | Respondent's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-08-14, (Printed version filed on 2023-08-09) | Attorney General of Canada |
2023-06-27 | Notice of hearing sent to parties, via email. | |
2023-06-27 |
Appeal hearing scheduled, 2023-11-09 Judgment reserved |
|
2023-06-12 | Appellant's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-06-15, (Printed version filed on 2023-06-12) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-06-12 | Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), 24A | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-06-12 | Appellant's record, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-06-13, (Printed version filed on 2023-06-12) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-06-12 | Appellant's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-06-13, (Printed version filed on 2023-06-12) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-06-09 | Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted) | |
2023-04-17 | Notice of appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2023-04-17, (Printed version filed on 2023-04-17) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2023-03-16 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
2023-03-16 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
2023-03-16 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-175-21, 2022 FCA 101, dated June 2, 2022, is granted with costs in the cause. The appeal will be heard with Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. His Majesty the King (40276). Granted, with costs in the cause |
|
2023-01-30 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
2022-10-06 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A | Attorney General of Canada |
2022-10-06 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2022-11-03, (Printed version due on 2022-10-14) | Attorney General of Canada |
2022-09-12 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2022-09-12 | |
2022-09-01 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2022-09-02) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2022-09-01 | Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2022-09-02) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
2022-09-01 | Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2022-09-01, (Printed version filed on 2022-09-02) | Iris Technologies Inc. |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Iris Technologies Inc. | Appellant | Active |
v.
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Attorney General of Canada | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Iris Technologies Inc.
Counsel
Mireille Dahab
Toronto, Ontario
M2n 0G3
Telephone: (416) 590-2671
Email: leigh@LSTLAW.ca
Agent
340 Gilmour Street
Suite 100
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca
Party: Attorney General of Canada
Counsel
Justine Malone
Christa Akey
East Tower, 9th Floor
234 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 670-6418
FAX: (613) 941-2293
Email: daniel.bourgeois@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Department of Justice Canada
50 O'Connor Street, Suite 500
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 670-6290
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
Administrative law — Judicial Review — Jurisdiction of Federal Court — Minister of National Revenue assessing taxpayer — Taxpayer applying for judicial review and seeking declarations it was denied procedural fairness, there was no evidentiary foundation upon which an assessment could be issued, and assessments were issued for improper purpose — Whether Federal Court has authority and jurisdiction to review conduct of Minister of National Revenue — If the only jurisdiction to review conduct of the Minister is in the determination of the correctness of the assessment in the Tax Court of Canada, who supervises the Minister?<br>
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Canada Revenue Agency completed an audit of monthly GST/HST returns of Iris Technologies Inc. Two days later, it commenced a second audit of certain reporting periods. The Minister of National Revenue withheld GST/HST refunds for the reporting periods under examination and denied Iris Technologies Inc.’s requests to have those funds released. Iris Technologies Inc. applied for judicial review seeking to compel the release of the refunds and seeking declarations that it was denied procedural fairness, that the Minister failed to follow policy with respect to the administration of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. E-15, that there was no evidentiary foundation upon which an assessment could be issued, and that the assessments were issued for an improper purpose. The Minister of National Revenue assessed and reassessed the reporting periods, and imposed penalties and interest, resulting in Iris Technologies Inc. owing $52,191,893.01. The Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss Iris Technologies Inc.’s application for judicial review. The Case Management Judge dismissed the motion. The Federal Court dismissed an appeal. The Federal Court of Appeal allowed an appeal and dismissed Iris Technologies Inc.’s application for judicial review.
Lower court rulings
Federal Court
T-768-20
Motion to strike application for judicial review dismissed
Motion appealing dismissal of motion dismissed
Appeal allowed, application struck
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available