Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
38661
Assmar Ryiad Shlah v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Alberta) (Criminal) (As of Right)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
---|---|---|
2020-07-15 | Appeal closed | |
2019-11-25 |
Transcript received, 52 pages Joint with 38677 |
|
2019-11-18 | Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties | |
2019-11-18 | Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties | |
2019-11-15 |
Judgment on the appeal rendered, Abe Mo Ka Côt Br Row Kas Dismissed, no order as to costs |
|
2019-11-15 |
Hearing of the appeal, 2019-11-15, Abe Mo Ka Côt Br Row Kas Judgment rendered |
|
2019-11-15 | Respondent's condensed book, (Book Form) | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-11-15 | Appellant's condensed book, (Book Form) | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-11-05 |
Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Brian Graff. Does not have any objection or concerns if the hearing of the appeal is webcasted live. |
Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-11-05 |
Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Balfour Der, Q.C. Does not have any objection or concerns if the hearing of the appeal is webcasted live. |
Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-10-31 | Appeal perfected for hearing | |
2019-10-23 | Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Iwona Kuklicz, Brian Graff and Rajbir Dhillon will appear before the court. Iwona Kuklicz and Brian Graff will present oral arguments. | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-10-23 | Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Balfour Q.H. Der, Q.C. and James O. Wyman will appear before the court. Mr. Der will present oral arguments. | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-10-02 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-10-02 | Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Letter Form) | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-10-02 | Respondent's record, (Book Form), Completed on: 2019-10-02 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-10-02 | Respondent's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2019-10-02 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-08-09 | Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Letter Form) | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-08-09 | Appellant's record, (Book Form), (7 volumes), Completed on: 2019-08-09 | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-08-09 | Appellant's factum, (Book Form), Electronic version revised rec'd 2019-10-21, Completed on: 2019-08-09 | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-08-08 | Notice of hearing sent to parties | |
2019-07-31 |
Appeal hearing scheduled, 2019-11-15, * EARLY START 9 A.M. * Judgment rendered |
|
2019-07-22 | Order on motion to extend time, by ROGER BILODEAU, Q.C. | |
2019-07-22 |
Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, UPON APPLICATION by the appellant for an order extending the time to serve and file his factum, record and book of authorities, if any, pursuant to Rules 6 and 47 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada; AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read; AND NOTING THAT the respondent consents to the motion; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The appellant shall serve and file his factum, record and book of authorities, if any, on or before August 9, 2019. Granted |
|
2019-07-22 | Submission of motion to extend time, Reg | |
2019-07-19 | Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2019-07-19 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2019-07-19 | Motion to extend time, (Letter Form), to file and serve the appellant's factum. , Completed on: 2019-07-19, (Printed version due on 2019-07-26) | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-06-04 | Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Notice of appeal – As of right) | |
2019-05-31 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a notice of appeal | |
2019-05-30 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
2019-05-30 | Notice of appeal, (Letter Form), Amended notice required-rec'd 2019/05/31, Completed on: 2019-05-31 | Assmar Ryiad Shlah |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Shlah, Assmar Ryiad | Applicant | Active |
v.
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Shlah, Assmar Ryiad
Counsel
James Wyman
2650, 645 7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4G8
Telephone: (403) 234-8824
FAX: (403) 261-8977
Email: balfour@derbarristers.com
Agent
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
3rd Floor, Centrium Place
Suite 300-332 6th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 0B2
Telephone: (403) 297-6005
FAX: (403) 297-3453
Email: brian.graff@gov.ab.ca
Agent
160 Elgin Street
Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-8695
FAX: (613) 788-3509
Email: lynne.watt@gowlingwlg.com
Summary
Keywords
Criminal law - Unreasonable verdict - Second degree murder - Whether the verdict was unreasonable.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The appellant was tried by judge and jury and convicted of second degree murder in the death of a young man who was attacked and beaten by a group of people in an alley behind a Calgary nightclub. The man was first beaten by several individuals and then stabbed four times. There was a short break in the beating, during which time some bystanders called for help, but a second wave of assailants arrived shortly thereafter and continued the assault by kicking and punching the man as he lay in a pool of his own blood, pleading for his life. The appellant appealed his conviction, arguing among other things that the verdict was unreasonable. A majority of the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. Veldhuis J.A., dissenting, would have allowed the appeal and entered an acquittal. In her view, a reasonable jury, properly instructed, could not have convicted the appellant of second degree murder on any of the pathways to conviction. In particular, she pointed to unreliable eyewitness evidence, DNA evidence which could not be used to infer that the appellant had kicked the man in a particularly violent fashion, a lack of evidence of blood where it would have been expected if the appellant had participated in a violent attack, and a history of the altercation which, while it might have explained the appellant’s presence in the alley or spoken to his motive or intent, did not assist in establishing whether he administered any blows to the deceased. Veldhuis J.A. also concluded that there was no reliable evidence which suggested that the appellant had helped or encouraged the individual who had stabbed the deceased or the group of individuals who had violently beat him.
Lower court rulings
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
141285486Q1
Appellant convicted of second degree murder
Court of Appeal of Alberta (Calgary)
2019 ABCA 184, 1601-0157-A
Appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available