Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


38270

Patrick John Goldfinch v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Alberta) (Criminal) (As of Right)

(Publication ban in case)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2019-07-10 Appeal closed
2019-07-02 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2019-07-02 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2019-06-28 Judgment on the appeal rendered, Abe Mo Ka Ga Br Row Mar,
The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton), Number 1703-0062-A, 2018 ABCA 240, dated July 6, 2018, heard on January 16, 2019, is dismissed. Brown J. dissents.
Dismissed
2019-01-24 Transcript received, 96 pages
2019-01-16 General proceeding, (Letter Form), Publication Ban Questionnaire Her Majesty the Queen
2019-01-16 General proceeding, (Letter Form), Publication Ban Questionnaire Patrick John Goldfinch
2019-01-16 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2019-01-16 Intervener's condensed book, (Book Form), Submitted in Court (14 Copies) Attorney General of Ontario
2019-01-16 Respondent's condensed book, (Book Form), Submitted in Court (14 copies) Her Majesty the Queen
2019-01-16 Appellant's condensed book, (Book Form), Submitted in Court (14 copies) Patrick John Goldfinch
2019-01-16 Hearing of the appeal, 2019-01-16, Abe Mo Ka Ga Br Row Mar
Judgment reserved
2019-01-09 Appeal perfected for hearing
2019-01-07 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Karen Papadopoulos and Jill Wilkin will be present at the hearing. Ms. Papadopoulos will present oral arguments. Attorney General of Ontario
2019-01-07 Intervener's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2019-01-07 Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario
2019-01-07 Intervener's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2019-01-07 Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario
2019-01-07 Intervener's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2019-01-07 Attorney General of Ontario
2018-12-18 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Megan Savard and Colleen McKeown will be present at the hearing. Ms. Savard will present oral arguments. Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario
2018-12-17 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B-Record Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23B-Factum Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Letter Form) Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Respondent's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-12-17 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Respondent's record, (Book Form), Redacted Electronic copy filed 2018/12/17, Completed on: 2018-12-17 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Respondent's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-12-17 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-17 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Deborah R. Hatch will be present at the hearing and will present oral arguments. Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-12-14 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Joanne B. Dartana and Matthew Griener will be present. Ms. Dartana will present oral arguments. Her Majesty the Queen
2018-12-06 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2018-12-06 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2019-01-16, (PREVIOUSLY TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR 2019-01-25)
Judgment reserved
2018-11-30 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2018-11-30 Order on motion for leave to intervene, by BROWN J.
2018-11-30 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Br,
UPON APPLICATION by the Attorney General of Ontario and the Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motions for leave to intervene are granted and the said two (2) interveners shall be entitled to each serve and file a factum not exceeding ten (10) pages in length on or before January 7, 2019.
The said two (2) interveners are each granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding five (5) minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
The interveners are not entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements resulting from their interventions.
Granted
2018-11-30 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Br
2018-11-28 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, the parties. Tentatively scheduled for January 16, 2019.
2018-11-26 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), Proof of service of the Attorney General of Ontario missing (received 2018-11-27)., Completed on: 2018-11-27 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-11-23 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), by Criminal Lawyers' Association. , Completed on: 2018-11-23 Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-11-23 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), by the Attorney General of Ontario., Completed on: 2018-11-23 Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-11-20 Notice of name, (Letter Form) Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario
2018-11-20 Motion for leave to intervene, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-11-20 Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario
2018-11-19 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) Attorney General of Ontario
2018-11-19 Motion for leave to intervene, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-11-19 Attorney General of Ontario
2018-10-23 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23B Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-10-23 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23A Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-10-23 Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Book Form) Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-10-23 Appellant's record, (Book Form), (3 volumes), Completed on: 2018-10-23 Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-10-23 Appellant's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-10-23 Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-09-21 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, the parties. The tentative hearing date will remain unchanged.
2018-09-13 Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Joanne B. Dartana. Opposition to have the hearing date modified. Her Majesty the Queen
2018-09-11 Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Colleen Bauman. Request to change the tentative hearing date. Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-09-06 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Notice of appeal – As of right)
2018-09-05 Letter acknowledging receipt of a notice of appeal, FILE OPENED: 05/09/2018
2018-08-28 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23B Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-08-28 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23A Patrick John Goldfinch
2018-08-28 Notice of appeal, (Book Form), MISSING: amended notice indicating file number (received 05/09/2018), Completed on: 2018-09-05 Patrick John Goldfinch

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Goldfinch, Patrick John Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Ontario Intervener Active
Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Goldfinch, Patrick John

Counsel
Deborah R. Hatch
Deborah Hatch Law
Suite 1740, SunLife Building
10123 - 99 Street
Edmonton, Alberta
T5J 3H1
Telephone: (780) 474-2888
FAX: (780) 665-1059
Email: dhatch@hatch.law
Agent
Colleen Bauman
Goldblatt Partners LLP
500-30 Metcalfe St.
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5L4
Telephone: (613) 482-2463
FAX: (613) 235-3041
Email: cbauman@goldblattpartners.com

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Joanne Dartana
Matthew Griener
Attorney General of Alberta
3rd Floor, Bowker Building
9833-109 Street
Edmonton, Alberta
T5K 2E8
Telephone: (780) 643-1857
FAX: (780) 422-1106
Email: joanne.dartana@gov.ab.ca
Agent
D. Lynne Watt
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
160 Elgin Street
Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-8695
FAX: (613) 788-3509
Email: lynne.watt@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Attorney General of Ontario

Counsel
G. Karen Papadopoulos
Jill Witkin
Attorney General of Ontario
Crown Law Office Criminal, 10th Flr.
720 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2S9
Telephone: (416) 326-4600
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: karen.papadopoulos@ontario.ca
Agent
Karen Perron
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
1300-100 Queen Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1J9
Telephone: (613) 369-4795
FAX: (613) 230-8842
Email: kperron@blg.com

Party: Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario

Counsel
Megan Savard
Colleen McKeown
Addario Law Group LLP
171 John Street
Suite 101
Toronto, Ontario
M5T 1X3
Telephone: (416) 979-6446
FAX: (866) 714-1196
Email: msavard@addario.ca
Agent
Colleen Bauman
Goldblatt Partners LLP
500-30 Metcalfe St.
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5L4
Telephone: (613) 482-2463
FAX: (613) 235-3041
Email: cbauman@goldblattpartners.com

Summary

Keywords

Criminal law - Evidence - Admissibility - Complainant’s sexual activity - Whether the trial judge correctly ruled that evidence of a relationship was not tendered for the purposes prohibited by s. 276 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985 c. C-46, and was properly admissible in evidence - Whether the trial judge erred in deeming admissible “relatively benign” relationship evidence with respect to which she provided the jury with correct legal instructions as to both the permissible and impermissible uses - Whether any error in the application of s. 276 would have had a material bearing on the acquittals in accordance with the test set out in R. v. Graveline, 2006 SCC 16, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 609.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE)

Patrick John Goldfinch, appellant, was acquitted on charges of assault and sexual assault. He and the complainant had been in a relationship together and, when it ended, they continued to see each other just for sex. At trial, evidence of the complainant’s sexual history was admitted, pursuant to s. 276 of the Criminal Code, on the basis that it would provide context and help avoid an erroneous misapprehension on the part of the jury that the relationship between Mr. Goldfinch and the complainant was platonic. The trial judge found that the evidence was relevant and had probative value that exceeded any prejudicial effect. The Crown appealed the acquittals, arguing that the trial judge was wrong to have admitted the evidence. A majority of the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial. Berger J.A., dissenting, would have dismissed the appeal on the basis that the trial judge’s analysis and the steps she took to comply with s. 276 revealed no misapprehension of the evidence nor any error warranting appellate intervention.

Lower court rulings

February 9, 2017
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta


Appellant acquitted of assault and sexual assault

July 6, 2018
Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton)

1703-0062-A, 2018 ABCA 240

Appeal allowed and new trial ordered

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Select format
Select language
Date modified: 2025-02-27