Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


37760

Her Majesty the Queen v. Marc Cyr-Langlois

(Quebec) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2018-10-30 Appeal closed
2018-10-30 Transcript received, 85 pages
2018-10-16 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2018-10-16 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2018-10-15 Written reasons rendered after oral judgment, CJ Abe Mo Ka Ga Côt Br Row Mar
2018-10-15 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Abe Mo Ka Ga Côt Br Row Mar, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal), Number

500-10-005977-150, 2017 QCCA 1033, dated June 29, 2017, was heard on October 15, 2018, and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally:

[TRANSLATION]
THE CHIEF JUSTICE — A majority of the judges of the Court would allow the appeal, although Côté J. would dismiss it.

As a result, the appeal is allowed, the verdict of acquittal is set aside and a new trial is ordered. Reasons will follow.
Allowed
2018-10-15 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2018-10-15 Hearing of the appeal, 2018-10-15, CJ Abe Mo Ka Ga Côt Br Row Mar
Decision rendered
2018-10-15 Intervener's condensed book, (Book Form), Submitted in Court (14 copies) Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense
2018-10-15 Respondent's condensed book, (Book Form), Submitted in Court (14 copies) Marc Cyr-Langlois
2018-10-15 Appellant's condensed book, (Book Form), Submitted in Court (14 copies) Her Majesty the Queen
2018-10-09 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Jonathan M. Rosenthal, Adam Little and James Foy will be present at the hearing. Mr. Little will present oral arguments. Criminal Lawyers' Association
2018-10-02 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), No one appearing Attorney General of Ontario
2018-10-01 Correspondence received from, (Included in the notice of appearance), Updated contact information Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense
2018-10-01 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Mr. Jean-Philippe Marcoux will be present at the hearign and will present oral arguments. Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense
2018-09-28 Notice of appearance, (Letter Form), Gabriel Bervin and Maxime Lacoursière will be present at the hearing. Mr. Bervin will present oral arguments. Her Majesty the Queen
2018-09-20 Notice of appearance, Ms. Marie-Pier Boulet and Mr. Hugo T. Marquis will be appearing and Ms. Boulet will present oral argument. Marc Cyr-Langlois
2018-09-05 Appeal perfected for hearing
2018-08-27 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2018-08-23 Notice of name, (Letter Form) Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense
2018-08-23 Intervener's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-08-23 Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense
2018-08-23 Intervener's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-08-23 Criminal Lawyers' Association
2018-08-22 Intervener's factum, (Book Form), 1 copy missing , Completed on: 2018-08-22 Attorney General of Ontario
2018-08-22 Intervener's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-08-23 Attorney General of Ontario
2018-08-20 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2018-10-15
Decision rendered
2018-08-16 Order on motion to extend time, (BY JUSTICE MARTIN)
2018-08-16 Decision on motion to extend time, Mar, UPON APPLICATION by the respondent for an order extending the time to file his factum to July 23, 2018;

AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.

The respondent is permitted to present oral argument at the hearing of the appeal pursuant to Rule 71(3).
Granted
2018-08-16 Submission of motion to extend time, Mar
2018-07-26 Motion to extend time, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2018-07-26 Marc Cyr-Langlois
2018-07-23 Respondent's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-07-23 Marc Cyr-Langlois
2018-07-12 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (by MOLDAVER J.)
2018-07-12 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Mo,
UPON APPLICATIONS by the Attorney General of Ontario, the Association québécoise des avocates et avocats de la defense and the Criminal Lawyers’Association for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motions for leave to intervene are granted and the said three (3) interveners shall be entitled to each serve and file a factum not to exceed ten (10) pages in length on or before August 23, 2018.
The Association québécoise des avocates et avocats de la defense and the Criminal Lawyers’Association are each granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding five (5) minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
The interveners are not entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements resulting from their interventions.
Granted
2018-07-12 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Mo
2018-06-22 Motion for leave to intervene, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-06-22, (Electronic version filed on 2018-06-22) Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense
2018-06-22 Motion for leave to intervene, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-06-22, (Printed version filed on 2018-06-22) Attorney General of Ontario
2018-06-22 Notice of name, REVISED filed on 2018-07-11. Criminal Lawyers' Association
2018-06-22 Motion for leave to intervene, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-06-22, (Electronic version filed on 2018-06-22) Criminal Lawyers' Association
2018-05-28 Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Letter Form) Her Majesty the Queen
2018-05-25 Appellant's record, (Book Form), (2 volumes), Form 24A missing.(rec'd May 28, 2018), Completed on: 2018-06-22 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-05-25 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23B Her Majesty the Queen
2018-05-25 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23A Her Majesty the Queen
2018-05-25 Appellant's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-05-25 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-04-10 Notice of appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2018-04-10 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-04-05 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2018-03-16 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2018-03-16 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2018-03-15 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal,
The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal), Number 500-10-005977-150, 2017 QCCA 1033, dated June 29, 2017, is granted.
Granted
2018-01-22 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2017-10-31 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), paper copy to come-rec'd 2017/11/07 Marc Cyr-Langlois
2017-10-27 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), 23A missing, Completed on: 2017-10-27 Marc Cyr-Langlois
2017-10-24 Correspondence received, from Me Marcoux, confirmation he was served with a copy of the notice of application.
2017-09-27 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2017/09/27
2017-09-26 Notice of name, (Letter Form) Her Majesty the Queen
2017-09-26 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Book Form), 23B Her Majesty the Queen
2017-09-26 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A Her Majesty the Queen
2017-09-26 Book of authorities, (Book Form), 4 more copies required - rec'd on Septembe 29, 2017., Completed on: 2017-10-02 Her Majesty the Queen
2017-09-26 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2017-09-26 Her Majesty the Queen

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Cyr-Langlois, Marc Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Ontario Intervener Active
Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense Intervener Active
Criminal Lawyers' Association Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Gabriel Bervin
Maxime Lacoursière
Directeur des poursuites pénales du Canada
Complexe Jules-Dallaire, 2828, boulevard Laurier
Tour 1, bureau 500
Québec, Quebec
G1V 0B9
Telephone: (418) 643-9059 Ext: 21591
FAX: (418) 644-3428
Email: gabriel.bervin@dpcp.gouv.qc.ca
Agent
Sandra Bonanno
Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales du Québec
17, rue Laurier
bureau 1.230
Gatineau, Quebec
J8X 4C1
Telephone: (819) 776-8111 Ext: 60446
FAX: (819) 772-3986
Email: sandra.bonanno@dpcp.gouv.qc.ca

Party: Cyr-Langlois, Marc

Counsel
Marie-Pier Boulet
Hugo Marquis
BMD Avocats
4020, rue Louis-B.Mayer
bureau 306
Laval, Quebec
H7P 0J1
Telephone: (514) 666-1111
FAX: (450) 681-0887
Email: info@bmdavocats.com

Party: Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense

Counsel
Jean-Philippe Marcoux
Marcoux et associés
785 Chemin de Chambly
Bureau 201
Longueuil, Quebec
J4H 3M2
Telephone: (450) 748-1599
FAX: (450) 463-2358
Email: jpmarcoux@noncoupable.ca

Party: Criminal Lawyers' Association

Counsel
Jonathan M. Rosenthal
Adam Little
James Foy
171 John Street
Suite 101
Toronto, Ontario
M5T 1X3
Telephone: (416) 360-7768
FAX: (416) 981-8896
Email: jrosenthal@bondlaw.net
Agent
Marie-France Major
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Attorney General of Ontario

Counsel
James V. Palangio
Attorney General of Ontario
Crown Law Office - Criminal
720 Bay Street, 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-2409
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: james.palangio@ontario.ca
Agent
Nadia Effendi
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
World Exchange Plaza
100 Queen Street, suite 1300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1J9
Telephone: (613) 787-3562
FAX: (613) 230-8842
Email: neffendi@blg.com

Summary

Keywords

Criminal law - Evidence - Presumption of accuracy and presumptions of identity in prosecutions for driving with blood alcohol level over legal limit - Failure to observe accused prior to administration of breathalyzer test - Whether recommendations have effect of creating additional burden of proof for Crown, with respect to improper operation of breathalyzer instrument, in order for Crown to benefit from presumptions of identity and accuracy in s. 258 Cr.C. - Whether accused can discharge burden of proving improper operation of breathalyzer instrument on basis of mere theoretical possibility of inaccurate result rather than evidence of direct connection between improper operation and reliability of results.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Mr. Cyr-Langlois was charged with two counts of impaired driving.

He was stopped while driving his vehicle and taken to the police station for a breathalyzer test. Around 12:58 a.m., he was put in an interrogation room while a police officer was taking the steps required for him to exercise his right to counsel and another police officer was preparing the breathalyzer device. The officer who testified at trial was the one who had prepared and administered the breathalyzer test. He was unable to say that Mr. Cyr-Langlois had been observed during the 15- or 20 minute period preceding the test. The first blood alcohol test was administered at 1:08 a.m. and the second at 1:30 a.m. The results showed a blood alcohol level exceeding 80 mg of alcohol in 100 mL of blood.

At trial, Mr. Cyr-Langlois brought a preliminary motion seeking to rebut the presumption that the results of the blood alcohol tests were valid. The issue was whether the officer who had operated the breathalyzer instrument had completed the necessary observation period before administering the test and whether evidence that the observation period had not been complied with could deprive the Crown of the presumptions established by s. 258(1)(c) of the Criminal Code.

Lower court rulings

December 19, 2014
Court of Quebec

700-01-113752-128

Accused acquitted of two counts of impaired driving

September 16, 2015
Superior Court of Quebec

2015 QCCS 4369, 700-36-001099-158

Appeal allowed; new trial ordered

June 29, 2017
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal)

2017 QCCA 1033, 500-10-005977-150

Appeal allowed; acquittal restored

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Select format
Select language
Date modified: 2025-02-27