Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


35518

Chief Sheldon Taypotat, et al. v. Louis Taypotat

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2015-06-03 Appeal closed
2015-05-29 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2015-05-29 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2015-05-28 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Abe Cro Mo Ka Wa Ga, The appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-427-12, 2013 FCA 192, dated August 13, 2013, heard on October 9, 2014, is allowed with costs and the decision of de Montigny J. is restored.
Allowed, with costs
2014-10-27 Transcript received, 75 Pages
2014-10-09 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2014-10-09 Respondent's condensed book, (Book Form), 14 copies, submitted in Court Louis Taypotat
2014-10-09 Appellant's condensed book, (Book Form), 14 copies, submitted in Court Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-10-09 Hearing of the appeal, 2014-10-09, CJ Abe Cro Mo Ka Wa Ga
Judgment reserved
2014-09-26 Notice of appearance, Mervin Phillips, Leane Phillips and Moira Dillon will be present Louis Taypotat
2014-09-26 Notice of appearance, Eugene Meehan, Q.C., Marie-France Major, James D. Jodouin and Marcus R. Davies will be present Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-09-05 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2014-09-05 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2014-10-09
Judgment reserved
2014-08-07 Order on motion to directions, (by MOLDAVER J.)
2014-08-07 Decision on motion for directions, Mo, UPON APPLICATION by the respondent for directions and for an order granting leave to adduce fresh evidence, namely the affidavit of Louis Earl Taypotat sworn June 27, 2014, and the exhibits attached thereto;
AND UPON APPLICATION by the respondent for an order granting leave to refer to this evidence in its factum and in its oral submissions before this Court;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted in part, with costs. The affidavit of Mr. Taypotat is not admissible as fresh evidence. However, given the public nature of the information and the limited use to which it is to be put, the affidavit should be filed to complete the record before this Court. The parties may refer to this evidence in their factum and in their oral submissions.
Allowed in part
2014-08-07 Submission of motion for directions, Mo
2014-08-01 Reply to motion for directions, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-08-01, (Electronic version filed on 2014-08-01) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-07-09 Response to motion for directions, Completed on: 2014-07-09, (Printed version filed on 2014-07-09) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-07-02 Motion for directions, (Book Form), and for leave to adduce new evidence, Completed on: 2014-07-02, (Electronic version filed on 2014-07-02) Louis Taypotat
2014-06-10 Appeal perfected for hearing
2014-06-09 Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Letter Form), (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-06) Louis Taypotat
2014-06-06 Correspondence received from, Moira Dillon re: will file a motion in order to file the election report Louis Taypotat
2014-06-06 Respondent's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-06-06, (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-06) Louis Taypotat
2014-06-06 Respondent's record, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-06-06, (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-06) Louis Taypotat
2014-06-06 Respondent's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-06-09, (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-06) Louis Taypotat
2014-06-02 Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Marie-France Major re: oppose to the filing of the Election Report, (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-02) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-05-30 Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Moira Dillon rec'd by e-mail re: Change affecting the record, (Electronic version filed on 2014-05-30) Louis Taypotat
2014-05-28 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (Judge CROMWELL)
2014-05-28 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Cro, UPON APPLICATION by Canada Without Poverty and the Charter Committee on Poverty Issues for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motion for leave to intervene is dismissed without costs.
Dismissed, without costs
2014-05-28 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Cro
2014-05-20 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2014-05-26, (Printed version filed on 2014-05-22) Canada Without Poverty
2014-05-20 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2014-05-20, (Electronic version filed on 2014-05-20) Louis Taypotat
2014-05-13 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2014-05-13, (Printed version filed on 2014-05-15) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-05-08 Motion for leave to intervene, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-05-08, (Electronic version filed on 2014-05-08) Canada Without Poverty
2014-05-07 Notice of constitutional question(s), (Attorney's General served 2014-05-07) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-05-06 Order on motion to extend time, (see order stating constitutional questions)
2014-05-06 Decision on motion to extend time, (see order stating constitutional questions), CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
2014-05-06 Submission of motion to extend time, CJ
2014-05-06 Order on motion to state a constitutional question, (by THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2014-05-06 Decision on the motion to state a constitutional question, CJ, UPON APPLICATION by the appellants for an order stating constitutional questions and extending the time within which the appellants may serve and file their motion to state constitutional questions in the above appeal;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motion by the appellants to extend the time to serve and file the motion to state constitutional questions is granted, and the constitutional questions are stated as follows:
1. Do paras. 9.03(c) and 10.01(d) of the Kahkewistahaw Election Act infringe s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
2. If so, is the infringement a reasonable limit prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society under s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Any Attorney General who intervenes pursuant to Rule 61(4) shall pay the appellants and respondent the costs of any additional disbursements they incur as a result of the intervention.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
1. Any attorney general wishing to intervene pursuant to par. 61(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada shall serve and file their factum and book of authorities no later than September 25, 2014.
Granted
2014-05-06 Submission of motion to state a constitutional question, CJ
2014-04-17 Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2014-04-17 Louis Taypotat
2014-04-11 Motion to extend time, (Letter Form), (Included in the motion to state a constitutional question), Included in the Motion to State a Constitutional Question, Completed on: 2014-04-11, (Electronic version filed on 2014-04-11) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-04-11 Motion to state a constitutional question, (Letter Form), Motion to ext. time included , Completed on: 2014-04-11, (Electronic version filed on 2014-04-11) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-04-11 Certificate of counsel (attesting to record), (Letter Form) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-04-11 Appellant's book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-04-11, (Electronic version filed on 2014-04-11) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-04-11 Appellant's record, (Book Form), 4 volumes, Completed on: 2014-04-11, (Electronic version filed on 2014-04-11) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-04-11 Appellant's factum, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-04-11, (Electronic version filed on 2014-04-11) Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2014-01-17 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2014-01-17 Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2013-12-23 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2013-12-20 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2013-12-20 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2013-12-19 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an expedited stay of execution is dismissed with costs. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-427-12, 2013 FCA 192, dated August 13, 2013, is granted with costs in the cause.
Granted, with costs in the cause
2013-12-19 Decision on the motion for a stay of execution, See judgment
Dismissed, with costs
2013-11-25 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Cro Wa
2013-11-25 Submission of motion for a stay of execution, CJ Cro Wa
2013-11-14 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2013-11-14 Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2013-11-14 Reply to motion for a stay of execution, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2013-11-14 Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2013-11-12 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2013-11-14 Louis Taypotat
2013-11-12 Response to the motion for a stay of execution, (Book Form), (3 add. copies rec'd Nov. 13, 2013), Completed on: 2013-11-14 Louis Taypotat
2013-11-06 Correspondence received from, James D. Jodouin dated Nov. 6, 2013 re motion for stay Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2013-10-31 Motion for a stay of execution, (Book Form), (and to expedite the motion for stay) (3 add. copies rec'd Nov. 13, 2013), Completed on: 2013-10-31 Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2013-10-15 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2013-10-10 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2013-10-15 Chief Sheldon Taypotat
2013-09-11 Notice of application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2013-09-11 Chief Sheldon Taypotat

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Chief Sheldon Taypotat Appellant Active
Michael Bob, Janice McKay, Iris Taypotat and Vera Wasacase as Chief and Council representatives of the Kahkewistahaw First Nation Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Taypotat, Louis Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Chief Sheldon Taypotat

Counsel
James D. Jodouin
Marcus R. Davies
Eugene Meehan, Q.C.
Bainbridge Jodouin Cheecham
401 261 1st Ave. N.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
S7K 1X2
Telephone: (306) 664-2468
FAX: (306) 664-2469
Agent
Marie-France Major
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Michael Bob, Janice McKay, Iris Taypotat and Vera Wasacase as Chief and Council representatives of the Kahkewistahaw First Nation

Counsel
James D. Jodouin
Bainbridge Jodouin Cheecham
401 261 1st Ave. N.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
S7K 1X2
Telephone: (306) 664-2468
FAX: (306) 664-2469
Agent
Marie-France Major
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Taypotat, Louis

Counsel
Mervin C. Phillips
Merrilee Rasmussen, Q.C.
Leane Phillips
Phillips & Co.
Haldane House
2100 Scarth St.
Regina, Saskatchewan
S4P 2H6
Telephone: (306) 569-0811
FAX: (306) 565-3434
Email: phillipsco@phillipsco.ca
Agent
Moira Dillon
Supreme Law Group
900 - 275 Slater Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5H9
Telephone: (613) 691-1224
FAX: (613) 691-1338
Email: mdillon@supremelawgroup.ca

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Right to Equality - Discrimination based on age - Discrimination based on Aboriginality-residence - Aboriginal law - Do paras. 9.03(c) and 10.01(d) of the Kahkewistahaw Election Act infringe s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? - If so, is the infringement a reasonable limit prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society under s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? - Is the distinction in the present case based on education levels or the enumerated ground of age or analogous ground of Aboriginality-residence? - Does the distinction create a disadvantage by perpetuating prejudice or stereotyping? - Do the education provisions constitute an ameliorative program directed at improving the situation of a group that is in need of ameliorative assistance in order to enhance substantive equality?

The appellants were the Chief and Band Council of the Kahkewistahaw First Nation. The respondent was the former Chief of the First Nation. The respondent was 74 years old and had been elected Chief for 27 years. He lost the 2009 election for Chief to his nephew by four votes. Until that point, the First Nation elections were conducted pursuant to the Indian Act.

The First Nation moved toward a community election code. In doing so, the Kahkewistahaw Election Act (hereinafter ‘Election Act’) was developed which would govern the election of the Chief and Council of the First Nation. The Election Act included specific educational provisions indicating that a candidate must have attained grade 12 or its equivalent.

The 2011 election was conducted pursuant to the Election Act. The respondent had attended a residential school and was evaluated at a grade 10 level. The Election Officer would not certify the respondent as a candidate for the office of the Chief because he failed to meet the educational requirements in the Election Act. The only candidate for Chief that was certified was his nephew, the appellant Sheldon Taypotat, who was declared elected by acclamation.

The application for judicial review was dismissed. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered a new election for the position of the Chief of the First Nation. An election was held and the respondent was elected to the position of Chief.

Lower court rulings

August 30, 2012
Federal Court

2012 FC 1036

Application for judicial review dismissed

August 13, 2013
Federal Court of Appeal

A-427-12, 2013 FCA 192

Appeal allowed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Select format
Select language
Date modified: 2025-02-27