Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


33965

Mark Whyte v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (As of Right)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2011-11-08 Transcript received, (34 pages)
2011-11-01 Appeal closed
2011-10-24 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2011-10-24 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2011-10-20 Judgment on the appeal rendered, De F Abe Ro Cro, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C51976, 2011 ONCA 24, dated October 19, 2010, was heard this day and the following judgment was rendered orally:
DESCHAMPS J. – We are of the view that the Court of Appeal did not err in finding that, as a matter of law,
“[s]ince the police had reasonable grounds, subjective and objective, to believe that the occupants of the vehicle were in possession of illegal firearms, the arrest of the occupants of the vehicle and search as an incident of the arrest were lawful. There was no violation of the respondent’s rights under ss. 8 and 9 of the Charter and the evidence should not have been excluded.”
(2011 ONCA 24, 266 C.C.C. (3d) 5, at para. 32)
The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed
2011-10-20 Hearing of the appeal, 2011-10-20, De F Abe Ro Cro
Judgment rendered
2011-10-20 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, All parties consent
2011-10-20 Respondent's condensed book, Rec'd in Court Her Majesty the Queen
2011-10-20 Appellant's condensed book, rec'd in Court Mark Whyte
2011-10-17 Supplemental document, (Further Supplementary Book of Authorities - sent to the judges Oct. 17/11), Completed on: 2011-10-18 Mark Whyte
2011-10-11 Supplemental document, (Authorities), Completed on: 2011-10-11 Mark Whyte
2011-10-11 Notice of appearance, Nathan Gorham will also be appearing Mark Whyte
2011-10-05 Notice of appearance, Jennifer Woollcombe will be appearing Her Majesty the Queen
2011-09-06 Correspondence received from, Gowling by email, re.: request for 2 reserved seats at the hearing Mark Whyte
2011-09-06 Notice of appearance, Reid Rusonik will be present at hearing Mark Whyte
2011-08-29 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2011-07-22 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2011-10-20, (start time 9:00am)
Judgment rendered
2011-05-11 Appeal perfected for hearing
2011-04-26 Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2011-04-26 Her Majesty the Queen
2011-04-26 Respondent's factum, Completed on: 2011-04-26 Her Majesty the Queen
2011-02-25 Appellant's book of authorities, Completed on: 2011-02-25 Mark Whyte
2011-02-25 Appellant's factum, Completed on: 2011-02-25 Mark Whyte
2011-02-23 Appellant's record, (2 volumes), Completed on: 2011-02-23 Mark Whyte
2010-12-14 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Notice of appeal – As of right)
2010-11-18 Notice of appeal, CD to come (rec'd Dec.3/10), Completed on: 2010-12-03 Mark Whyte

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Whyte, Mark Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Whyte, Mark

Counsel
Reid Rusonik
Nathan Gorham
Rusonik, O'Connor, Robbins, Ross, Gorham & Angelini LLP
36 Lombard Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 2X3
Telephone: (416) 598-1811 Ext: 5252
FAX: (416) 598-3384
Email: rusonik@criminaltriallawyers.ca
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: brian.crane@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Jennifer M. Woollcombe
Attorney General of Ontario
720 Bay Street
10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-4604
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: jennifer.woollcombe@ontario.ca
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Charter of rights - Criminal law - Search and seizure - Arbitrary detention - Whether the trial judge erred in holding that the appellant’s rights under ss. 8 and 9 of the Charter were violated - Whether the trial judge erred in excluding the seized firearms pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Charter.

Following a tip provided by a police informer and information gathered from police surveillance, Mr. Whyte, the occupant of a rental car, was stopped by a police tactical team in downtown Toronto and arrested without a warrant for various firearms offences. At trial, evidence relating to the firearms was excluded pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Charter on the basis that Mr. Whyte’s ss. 8 and 9 Charter rights had been violated. Mr. Whyte was accordingly acquitted. The Court of Appeal overturned the trial judge’s conclusion on the admissibility of the evidence and entered convictions. In its view, the trial judge had failed to give appropriate weight to the fact that the informer was credible and had failed to consider the totality of the circumstances, particularly the impact of the ongoing police surveillance.

Lower court rulings

March 16, 2010
Ontario Superior Court of Justice

3604/09, 2010 ONSC 979

See file

October 19, 2010
Court of Appeal for Ontario

C51976, 2011 ONCA 24

Appeal is allowed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Select format
Select language
Date modified: 2025-02-27