Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


33266

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia v. Ripudaman Singh Malik, et al.

(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2011-11-30 Appeal closed
2011-11-28 Certificate of taxation issued to, Pierre Landry
2011-11-24 Decision on the bill of costs, in the amount of $16,352.88, Reg
2011-11-23 Submission of the bill of costs, Reg
2011-10-19 Bill of costs, Completed on: 2011-10-19 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2011-06-13 Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
2011-04-26 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2011-04-26 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2011-04-21 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Bi LeB De F Abe Cha Ro Cro, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Numbers CA036403, CA036406 and CA036413, 2009 BCCA 201, dated May 7, 2009, heard on October 15, 2010, is allowed with costs.
Allowed, with costs
2010-11-08 Transcript received, (62 pages)
2010-11-05 Appeal court record, (2 boxes)
2010-10-15 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2010-10-15 Respondent's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-10-15 Respondent's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Jaspreet S. Malik
2010-10-15 Appellant's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-10-15 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, From all parties
2010-10-15 Hearing of the appeal, 2010-10-15, CJ Bi LeB De F Abe Cha Ro Cro
Judgment reserved
2010-09-24 Notice of appearance, Bruce McLeod and Jaspreet Malik will be present at the hearing. Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-09-02 Notice of appearance, Jonathan Noel Eades, Matthew Taylor and Robert Hamilton will be present at the hearing. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-07-12 Supplemental document, (Supplemental Record) - new CD rec' d July 15/10, Completed on: 2010-07-15 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-07-12 Supplemental document, (Supplemental Book of Authorities) - new CD rec'd July 15/10, Completed on: 2010-07-15 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-07-12 Reply factum on appeal, See Order of Justice Rothstein dated June 30/10 - New CD rec'd July 15/10, Completed on: 2010-07-15 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-07-05 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2010-07-05 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2010-10-15, (start time 9:30 a.m.)
Judgment reserved
2010-06-30 Order on motion to file a reply factum on appeal
2010-06-30 Decision on the motion to file a reply factum on appeal, Ro, of no more than 10 pages in length, a reply record limited to a complete copy of the Transcripts of Proceedings before the Chambers Judge on Oct. 25/07and a reply book of authorities within 10 days of the order
Granted
2010-06-30 Submission of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, Ro
2010-06-24 Response to motion to file a reply factum on appeal, (JOINT ) of no more than 10 pages, a reply record limited to a complete copy of the Transcripts of Proceedings before the Chambers Judge on Oct. 25/07and a reply book of authorities within 10 days of the order (Motion filed by Her Majesty the Queen), Completed on: 2010-06-24 Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-06-17 Motion to file a reply factum on appeal, of no more than 10 pages in length, a reply record limited to a complete copy of the Transcripts of Proceedings before the Chambers Judge on Oct. 25/07and a reply book of authorities within 10 days of the order, Completed on: 2010-06-17 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-06-07 Correspondence received from, Marie-France Major dated June 7, 2010. Re: revised pages that reflect correct references to the Record Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-06-01 Respondent's book of authorities, Joint, Completed on: 2010-06-01 Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-06-01 Respondent's record, Joint (2 volumes), Completed on: 2010-06-01 Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-06-01 Respondent's factum, Joint (Revised pages inserted on June 8, 2010), Completed on: 2010-06-01 Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-06-01 Respondent's factum, Completed on: 2010-06-01 Jaspreet S. Malik
2010-06-01 Appeal perfected for hearing
2010-04-06 Appellant's record, Vol. 1 to 4 - CD to follow, Completed on: 2010-04-15 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-04-06 Appellant's book of authorities, Vol 1 and 2 - CD rec'd Apr. 12/10, Completed on: 2010-04-15 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-04-06 Appellant's factum, CD rec'd Apr. 12/10, Completed on: 2010-04-13 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-01-19 Order on motion to extend time to serve and/or file notice of appeal
2010-01-19 Decision on motion to extend time to serve and/or file notice of appeal, (amended) to Jan. 14/10, LeB
Granted
2010-01-18 Submission of motion to extend time to serve and/or file notice of appeal submitted, LeB
2010-01-14 Response to motion to extend time to serve and/or file notice of appeal, from M.-F. Major dated Jan. 14/10 re: consents (by e-mail) (included with motion), Completed on: 2010-01-14 Ripudaman Singh Malik
2010-01-14 Motion to extend the time to serve and/or file the notice of appeal, for the amended notice of appeal to Jan. 14/10, Completed on: 2010-01-14 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-01-11 Notice of appeal, (amended notice and CD re: C/A file numbers missing and extension of time requested - rec'd Jan. 14/10 with service), Completed on: 2010-01-14 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2010-01-06 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, all parties, by fax, dated Jan-6-10 re: amended tentative hearing date
2010-01-05 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2009-12-11 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2009-12-11 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2009-12-10 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Numbers CA036403, CA036406 and CA036413, 2009 BCCA 201, dated May 7, 2009, is granted with costs in the cause.
Granted, with costs in the cause
2009-10-19 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Bi F Cha
2009-09-03 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2009-09-03 Ripudaman Singh Malik
2009-08-26 Correspondence received from, Jonathan Eades, by fax, dated Aug.26-09, Re: court form for CA order and explanation of delay Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia
2009-08-12 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal and without formal Court of Appeal order
2009-08-06 Application for leave to appeal, 2 volumes , Final CA Order missing (draft form rec'd Aug.26-09) final rec'd Dec.2-09, Completed on: 2009-12-02 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Malik, Ripudaman Singh Respondent Active
Malik, Raminder Respondent Active
Malik, Jaspreet S. Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Attorney General of British Columbia

Counsel
Jonathan Eades
Matthew S. Taylor
Robert N. Hamilton
Attorney General of British Columbia
1001 Douglas Street, 3rd floor
Legal Services Branch
Victoria, British Columbia
V8W 9J7
Telephone: (250) 387-2789
FAX: (250) 953-3557
Email: jonathan.eades@gov.bc.ca
Agent
Pierre Landry
Noël et Associés, s.e.n.c.r.l.
111, rue Champlain
Gatineau, Quebec
J8X 3R1
Telephone: (819) 503-2178
FAX: (819) 771-5397
Email: p.landry@noelassocies.com

Party: Malik, Ripudaman Singh

Counsel
Bruce E. McLeod
1120 - 1040 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 4H1
Telephone: (604) 682-3133
FAX: (604) 682-3161
Email: bmcleod1@telus.net
Agent
Marie-France Major
Lang Michener LLP
300 - 50 O'Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 232-7171
FAX: (613) 231-3191
Email: mmajor@langmichener.ca

Party: Malik, Raminder

Counsel
Thomas Manson
Forstrom Jackson
1200 - 625 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6C 2T6
Telephone: (604) 685-8757
FAX: (604) 661-0759
Email: trm@fjlaw.ca
Agent
Marie-France Major
Lang Michener LLP
300 - 50 O'Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 232-7171
FAX: (613) 231-3191
Email: mmajor@langmichener.ca

Party: Malik, Jaspreet S.

Counsel
Jaspreet Singh Malik
Malik Law Corporation
206 - 8388, 128th Street
Surrey, British Columbia
V3W 4G2
Telephone: (604) 543-9111
FAX: (604) 543-9112
Email: jaspreet@maliklaw.ca
Agent
Marie-France Major
Lang Michener LLP
300 - 50 O'Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 232-7171
FAX: (613) 231-3191
Email: mmajor@langmichener.ca

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Evidence - Admissibility - Hearsay evidence - Judgments and orders - Interlocutory orders - Anton Piller order - Requirements for order - Injunctions - Mareva injunction - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in disallowing the evidentiary use of prior judicial determination, and more particularly, whether it erred in holding that the Rowbotham findings, except to the extent that they were binding and met the tests for issue estoppel or abuse of process, were wholly inadmissible for any purpose - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in interfering with the inherent jurisdiction of a superior court judge to defer until trial the decision as to the final evidentiary use of the uncontested findings of a prior judicial decision of a fellow superior court judge.

Ripudaman Singh Malik (“Mr. Malik”) was charged in connection with the 1985 Air India bombing. He entered into a series of agreements with the Appellant for assistance in funding his defence costs. When Mr. Malik failed to transfer his assets to the Appellant as required by the agreements, the Appellant gave notice it would terminate the funding. Mr. Malik brought an application seeking relief pursuant to the decision in R. v. Rowbotham (1988), 41 C.C.C. (3d) 1, 25 O.A.C. 321. Madam Justice Stromberg-Stein dismissed Mr. Malik’s application on the basis that he failed to discharge the onus of establishing that he was not in a position to contribute to funding his defence, and that he had disentitled himself to Rowbotham funding by his actions: 2003 BCSC 1439, 111 C.R.R. (2d) 40. The Appellant ultimately brought an action against the Respondents and others seeking recovery of the funds provided, and applied ex parte for a Mareva injunction and an Anton Piller order, relying on affidavit evidence and the findings from 2003 BCSC 1439.

Lower court rulings

October 23, 2007
Supreme Court of British Columbia

S077088

Applicant’s application for Mareva injunction and Anton Piller order granted

July 31, 2008
Supreme Court of British Columbia

2008 BCSC 1027

Applications to set aside Mareva injunction and Anton Piller order dismissed, subject to variation of Mareva injunction to increase amount available to pay legal fees

May 7, 2009
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

2009 BCCA 201, CA036403, CA036406, CA036413

Applications to set aside Mareva injunction and Anton Piller order dismissed, subject to variation of Mareva injunction to increase amount available to pay legal fees

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Select format
Select language
Date modified: 2025-02-27