Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


30187

Attorney General of Canada v. Attorney General of Quebec

(Quebec) (Civil) (As of Right)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2006-02-09 Appeal closed
2006-02-09 Certificate of taxation issued to, C. Joyal (Justice, Montréal)
2006-02-08 Decision on the bill of costs, taxed at the amount of $25,174.41, Reg
2006-02-03 Submission of the bill of costs, Reg
2006-02-02 Reply to the bill of costs, (Letter Form), from C. Joyal dated February 2, 2006 (fax copy), Completed on: 2006-02-02 Attorney General of Canada
2006-02-01 Response to the bill of costs, (Letter Form), S. Roussel dated February 1st, 2006 (fax copy), Completed on: 2006-02-01 Attorney General of Quebec
2006-01-16 Bill of costs, Completed on: 2006-01-31 Attorney General of Canada
2005-12-21 Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
2005-10-21 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2005-10-21 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2005-10-20 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Bi LeB De F Abe Cha, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Quebec), Number 200-09-003962-021, dated January 27, 2004, heard on January 11, 2005 is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeal is set aside, with costs.
The constitutional questions are answered as follows:
Question 1: Does s. 22 of the Employment Insurance Act encroach upon provincial legislative competence and, more particularly, provincial legislative competence over property and civil rights and matters of a merely local or private nature under ss. 92(13) and 92(16) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
Answer: No.
Question 2: Does s. 23 of the Employment Insurance Act encroach upon provincial legislative competence and, more particularly, provincial legislative competence over property and civil rights and matters of a merely local or private nature under ss. 92(13) and 92(16) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
Answer: No.
Question 3: Is s. 22 of the Employment Insurance Act ultra vires the Parliament of Canada and, more particularly, does it exceed the Parliament of Canada's legislative competence over unemployment insurance under s. 91(2A) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
Answer: No.
Question 4: Is s. 23 of the Employment Insurance Act ultra vires the Parliament of Canada and, more particularly, does it exceed the Parliament of Canada's legislative competence over unemployment insurance under s. 91(2A) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
Answer: No.
Allowed, with costs
2005-07-21 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, all parties. Re: Lock-up
2005-06-30 Correspondence received from, Dominique Rousseau, re: Lock-up Attorney General of Quebec
2005-06-30 Correspondence received from, Claude Joyal & René Leblanc, re: Lock-up Attorney General of Canada
2005-06-22 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, all parties, re: proposed lock-up
2005-01-27 Transcript received, (62 pages)
2005-01-11 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2005-01-11 Respondent's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Attorney General of Quebec
2005-01-11 Appellant's condensed book, Submitted in court with an agenda of oral arguments (14 copies) Attorney General of Canada
2005-01-11 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, From all parties
2005-01-11 Hearing of the appeal, 2005-01-11, CJ Bi LeB De F Abe Cha
Judgment reserved
2005-01-05 Notice of appearance, Steven M. Barrett and Charlene Wiseman will be present at the hearing. Canadian Labour Congress
2005-01-05 Notice of appearance, Written submissions only at hearing. Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador
2005-01-04 Notice of appearance, Claude Joyal and René Leblanc will be present at the hearing. Attorney General of Canada
2004-12-22 Notice of appearance, Dominique Rousseau and Pierre Christian Labeau will be present at hearing. Attorney General of Quebec
2004-12-22 Order on motion to file a reply factum on appeal, (BY BASTARACHE J.)
2004-12-22 Decision on the motion to file a reply factum on appeal, Ba, À LA SUITE D'UNE DEMANDE de l'intimé visant à obtenir la permission de signifier et de déposer un mémoire en réplique aux mémoires des intervenants et un recueil de sources additionnelles;
ET APRÈS EXAMEN des documents déposés;
IL EST PAR LA PRÉSENTE ORDONNÉ CE QUI SUIT:
La requête est rejetée.
Dismissed
2004-12-22 Submission of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, Ba
2004-12-14 Response to motion to file a reply factum on appeal, and additional authorities, Completed on: 2004-12-14 Attorney General of Canada
2004-12-07 Motion to file a reply factum on appeal, and additional authorities, Completed on: 2004-12-07 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-11-25 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2004-11-25 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2005-01-11
Judgment reserved
2004-11-16 Order by, Ba, UPON APPLICATION by the Canadian Labour Congress for leave to intervene in the above appeal and pursuant to the order of September 20, 2004;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the said intervener is granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding fifteen (15) minutes in total at the hearing of this appeal.
Granted
2004-11-15 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2004-11-15 Canadian Labour Congress
2004-11-12 Notice of change of counsel, Claude Bouchard will be replaced by Dominique Rousseau. Attorney General of Quebec
2004-10-21 Notice of withdrawal Attorney General of Nova Scotia
2004-10-13 Correspondence received from, Gaétan Migneault dated 10/07/04 re: will not be appearing at the hearing of the appeal Attorney General of New Brunswick
2004-10-08 Book of authorities, (15 copies), Completed on: 2004-10-08 Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador
2004-10-08 Intervener's factum - AG on constitutional question, (27 copies), Completed on: 2004-10-08 Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador
2004-10-06 Notice of withdrawal Attorney General for Saskatchewan
2004-09-24 Notice of withdrawal Attorney General of Ontario
2004-09-20 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY BASTARACHE J.)
2004-09-20 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ba, The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Income Security Advocacy Centre, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2004-09-20 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY BASTARACHE J.)
2004-09-20 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ba, The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Canadian Labour Congress, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length.
The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the intervener.
The intervener shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the intervention.
Granted
2004-09-20 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Ba
2004-09-20 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Claude Joyal (fax) dated Sept. 17#04, Completed on: 2004-09-20 Attorney General of Canada
2004-09-09 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from J. Frenschkowski dated 09/08/04 (to Mr. Bouchard's letter), Completed on: 2004-09-09 Income Security Advocacy Centre
2004-09-08 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Claude Joyal dated 09/07/04, Completed on: 2004-09-08 Attorney General of Canada
2004-09-08 Appeal perfected for hearing
2004-09-03 Supplemental document, (14 copies of Acts & Regulations) Attorney General of New Brunswick
2004-09-03 Respondent's book of authorities, (Vol. 1 to 3), Completed on: 2004-09-16 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-09-03 Respondent's record, (Vol. 1 to 3), Completed on: 2004-09-16 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-09-03 Respondent's factum, (Vol. 1 to 4), Completed on: 2004-09-16 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-09-03 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Claude Bouchard dated 09/02/04 (to ISAC), Completed on: 2004-09-03 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-09-02 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-09-02 Attorney General of New Brunswick
2004-09-02 Intervener's factum - AG on constitutional question, Completed on: 2004-09-02 Attorney General of New Brunswick
2004-08-27 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2004-08-31 Income Security Advocacy Centre
2004-08-23 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Claude Bouchard dated 08/23/04 (to CLC), Completed on: 2004-08-23 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-08-10 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2004-08-10 Canadian Labour Congress
2004-07-14 Appellant's book of authorities, Vol. I & II, Completed on: 2004-07-14 Attorney General of Canada
2004-07-14 Appellant's record, Vol. I to IX, Completed on: 2004-07-14 Attorney General of Canada
2004-07-14 Appellant's factum, Vol. I to IV, Completed on: 2004-07-14 Attorney General of Canada
2004-05-21 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question Attorney General of Nova Scotia
2004-05-21 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador
2004-05-21 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question Attorney General of Ontario
2004-05-20 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question Attorney General for Saskatchewan
2004-05-20 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question Attorney General of New Brunswick
2004-04-23 Notice of constitutional question(s) Attorney General of Canada
2004-04-21 Order on motion to state a constitutional question, (BY CHIEF JUSTICE)
2004-04-21 Decision on the motion to state a constitutional question, CJ, 1. Does s. 22 of the Employment Insurance Act encroach upon provincial legislative competence and, more particularly, provincial legislative competence over property and civil rights and matters of a merely local or private nature under ss. 92(13) and 92(16) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
2. Does s. 23 of the Employment Insurance Act encroach upon provincial legislative competence and, more particularly, provincial legislative competence over property and civil rights and matters of a merely local or private nature under ss. 92(13) and 92(16) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
3. Is s. 22 of the Employment Insurance Act ultra vires the Parliament of Canada and, more particularly, does it exceed the Parliament of Canada's legislative competence over unemployment insurance under s. 91(2A) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
4. Is s. 23 of the Employment Insurance Act ultra vires the Parliament of Canada and, more particularly, does it exceed the Parliament of Canada's legislative competence over unemployment insurance under s. 91(2A) of the Constitution Act, 1867?
Granted
2004-04-19 Submission of motion to state a constitutional question, CJ
2004-03-30 Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, (Letter Form), From Sylvie E. Roussel dated 03/30/04, Completed on: 2004-03-30 Attorney General of Quebec
2004-03-19 Correspondence received from, C. Joyal dated March 18, 2004 re: const. questions Attorney General of Canada
2004-03-19 Motion to state a constitutional question, Completed on: 2004-03-19 Attorney General of Canada
2004-03-10 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Notice of appeal – As of right)
2004-03-08 Appeal court record, (2 boxes)
2004-02-26 Notice of appeal, AMENDED, Completed on: 2004-02-26 Attorney General of Canada
2004-02-23 Notice of appeal, (25B and reasons for judgment included) re: S. 36 of the Act, Completed on: 2004-02-23 Attorney General of Canada

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Canada Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Quebec Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Attorney General of New Brunswick Intervener Active
Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador Intervener Active
Canadian Labour Congress Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Attorney General of Canada

Counsel
Claude Joyal
René Leblanc
Procureur général du Canada
Tour est, 5e étage, Complexe Guy-Favreau
200, boul. René-Lévesque ouest
Montréal, Quebec
H2Z 1X4
Telephone: (514) 283-8768
FAX: (514) 283-3856
Email: claude.joyal@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Christopher M. Rupar
Attorney General of Canada
Bank of Canada Building - East Tower
234 Wellington Street, Room 1212
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 941-2351
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca

Party: Attorney General of Quebec

Counsel
Claude Bouchard
Dominique Rousseau
Pierre Christian Labeau
Hugue Melançon
Procureur général du Québec
1200 Route de l'Église
Ste-Foy, Quebec
G1V 4M1
Telephone: (418) 649-3564
FAX: (418) 646-1656
Agent
Sylvie Roussel
Noël et Associés, s.e.n.c.r.l.
111, rue Champlain
Gatineau, Quebec
J8X 3R1
Telephone: (819) 771-7393
FAX: (819) 771-5397
Email: s.roussel@noelassocies.com

Party: Attorney General of New Brunswick

Counsel
Gaétan Migneault
Attorney General of New Brunswick
Centennial Building, Room 447
P.O. Box 6000
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Telephone: (506) 453-2222
FAX: (506) 453-3275
Email: gaetan.migneault@gnb.ca
Agent
Henry S. Brown, Q.C.
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
P.O. Box 466, Stn "D"
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 788-3433
Email: henry.brown@gowlings.com

Party: Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador

Counsel
Barbara Barrowman
Matthew Gervan
Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador
4th Floor, East Block
Confederation Bldg.
St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador
A1B 4J6
Telephone: (709) 729-2869
FAX: (709) 729-2129
Email: barbarabarrowman@gov.nl.ca
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Party: Canadian Labour Congress

Counsel
Steven Barrett
Charlene Wiseman
Sack Goldblatt Mitchell
1130 - 20 Dundas St West
Box 180
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2G8
Telephone: (416) 979-6422
FAX: (416) 591-7333
Email: stevenbarrett@sgmlaw.com
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Sections 22 and 23 of the Employment Insurance Act (“E.I.A.”) provide for the payment of “special benefits” to insured pregnant women and parents, authorizing the payment of income replacement benefits for periods of 15 weeks in the case of maternity benefits and 35 weeks in the case of parental benefits.

In February 1996, the Quebec government announced its intention to introduce a plan establishing maternity and parental benefits for workers. To facilitate the implementation of the plan, it negotiated with the Government of Canada for an agreement to have the Canada Employment Insurance Commission make regulations under s. 69(2) of the E.I.A. Under s. 69(2), the Commission is required to make regulations to provide a system for reducing the employer’s and employee’s premiums when the payment of allowances to insured persons under a provincial law would have the effect of reducing or eliminating the special benefits payable to them.

On May 25, 2001, the Quebec National Assembly adopted the Act respecting parental insurance, which established “a parental insurance plan, the object of which is to give eligible workers entitlement to maternity benefits and paternity and parental benefits on the birth of a child, and adoption benefits in connection with the adoption of a minor”.

As the negotiations initiated in 1996 with the Government of Canada had not yielded the expected results, the Quebec government made a reference to the Court of Appeal, which declared that ss. 22 and 23 of the E.I.A. encroached upon provincial legislative competence and were ultra vires the Parliament of Canada as regards its legislative competence over unemployment insurance.

Lower court rulings

January 27, 2004
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Québec)

200-09-003962-021

Avis consultatif; art. 22 et 23 de la Loi sur l'assurance-emploi empiètent sur la compétence des provinces et excède la compétence du Parlement dans le domaine de l'assurance-chômage

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13