Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


23075

Her Majesty the Queen v. David Angelo Grant

(British Columbia) (Criminal) (As of Right)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-12 Appeal closed
1994-07-22 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to C/A of BC (Vancouver, BC) enclosing their record
1993-10-14 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Hughes & Hughes (Ottawa, ON)
1993-10-14 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Deputy Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
1993-10-14 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-10-12 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, British Columbia (Vancouver)
1993-09-30 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma, The appeal is allowed, the acquittals are set aside and a new trial is ordered. For answers to Constitutional Questions please see file.
Allowed, no order as to costs
1993-09-30 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-09-30 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Deputy Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
1993-09-30 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Hughes & Hughes (Ottawa, ON)
1993-09-21 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Greg Cranston; re: adopt the arguments of Mr. Rosenberg sent to CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL I Ma, Sept 22/93
1993-07-30 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Rosenberg & Rosenberg; re: responding to the appellant's two additional cases sent to CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL I Ma, August 3, 1993
1993-07-28 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of Robert J. Frater dated July 27, 1993 along with 2 unreported decisions of the B.C. Court of Appeal in "R. v. McNeil" and "R. v. Blinch", a letter of David Frankel, Q.C. dated July 16, 1993 and a letter of David Rosenberg dated July 23, 1993 sent to CJ
1993-07-12 Close file on Leave
1993-06-01 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, fr. Rosenberg & Rosenberg re: Bill C-85 enclosed should be brought to the attention of the Court sent to CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL I Maj, June 8/93
1993-05-31 Order on miscellaneous motion, With service
1993-05-20 Decision on miscellaneous motion, for an order for directions regarding the filing of supplementary material. Seeing the respondent's consent of May 19, 1993 filing of exhibit F and G is allowed for consideration therof by the Court., G
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-05-20 Hearing of miscellaneous motion, 1993-05-20, for an order for directions regarding the filing of supplementary material. Seeing the respondent's consent of May 19, 1993 filing of exhibit F and G is allowed for consideration therof by the Court., G
1993-05-20 Submission of miscellaneous motion, 1993-05-20, for an order for directions regarding the filing of supplementary material. Seeing the respondent's consent of May 19, 1993 filing of exhibit F and G is allowed for consideration therof by the Court., G
1993-05-20 Response to miscellaneous motion, to file supplementary material David Angelo Grant
1993-05-17 Affidavit, for directions regarding the filing of supplementary material (of David S. Frankel, Q.C.), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-05-17 Notice of miscellaneous motion, for directions regarding the filing of supplementa ry material, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-05-11 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from Rosenberg & Rosenberg; re: that is is inappropriate to make submission to the Court without leave; not consenting to the submissions forwarded by the Queen
1993-05-10 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Department of Justice Canada (Vancouver, BC) from A. Roland re: copies of decision of the Court of Appeal of Manitoba in The Queen v. Lamy filed on behalf f the Respondent were distributed to the Members of the Court on May 3/93
1993-05-10 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from Rosenberg & Rosenberg; re: respond to the submissions of David Frankel
1993-05-07 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Department of Justice Canada (Vancouver, BC) by Fax, c.c. to David M. Rosenberg, Esq., Greg Cranston, Esq., Robert J. Frater, Esq. from A. Roland re: additional submissions only on the consent of the other parties or with leave of a Judge
1993-05-07 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from S. David Frankel, Q.C.; re: please advise if the judgment of the Manitoba Court was filed by the respondent
1993-05-06 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from S. David Frankel, Q.C.; re: states the appellant's position with respect to the judgment in R. v. Lamy filed by the Respondent
1993-05-03 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from S. David Frankel, Q.C. sent to David M. Rosenberg; re: reserve the right to file a brief memorandum if Regina v. Lamy is place before the Court sent to CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL I Maj, May 4/93
1993-05-03 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of Henry S. Brown (Gowling, Strathy & Henderson) along with 10 copies of a Manitoba Court of Appeal decision in "Queen v. Lamy" to be distributed to the justices sent to CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL I Maj May 4/93
1993-04-29 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from S. David Frankel, Q.C. sent to David M. Rosenberg; re: no objection to the recent decision in R. v. Lamy bein brought to the attention of the Court
1993-04-26 General proceeding, transcript received and distributed to the judges (145 pages)
1993-04-08 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of David Frankel, Q.C. dated April 5, 1993 about the definition of the term "dwelling-house" sent to CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL I Maj, April 13, 1993
1993-04-03 General proceeding, 10 copies of Manitoba Court of Appeal decision in "Queen v. Lamy" David Angelo Grant
1993-04-02 Hearing of the appeal, 1993-04-02, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma
Decision reserved
1993-04-01 Affidavit, Margaret Klassen; 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-04-01 Motion to adduce new evidence, 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-30 Decision on the motion to file a reply factum on appeal, Reg
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-03-30 Hearing of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, 1993-03-30, Reg
1993-03-30 Submission of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, 1993-03-30, Reg
1993-03-30 Decision on miscellaneous motion, for additional time for oral argument for the appeal by one-half hour,, CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-03-30 Hearing of miscellaneous motion, 1993-03-30, for additional time for oral argument for the appeal by one-half hour,, CJ
1993-03-30 Submission of miscellaneous motion, 1993-03-30, for additional time for oral argument for the appeal by one-half hour,, CJ
1993-03-29 Book of authorities, 10 copies (joint authorities). Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-29 Reply factum on appeal, 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-26 Response to miscellaneous motion, for additional time by Gowling Strathy., with service David Angelo Grant
1993-03-26 Affidavit, for additional time namely one half hour, of David Frankel, Q.C., with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-26 Notice of miscellaneous motion, for additional time to make oral argument namely one half hour. Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-26 Response to motion to file a reply factum on appeal David Angelo Grant
1993-03-26 Affidavit, Robert J. Frater Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-26 Motion to file a reply factum on appeal Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-23 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from S. David Frankel, Q.C.; re: time alloted for the hearing of the appeal
1993-03-17 Notice of withdrawal, With service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-03-09 Appeal court record, (accordeon)
1993-03-02 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1993-04-02
Decision reserved
1993-02-12 Intervener's factum, 24 copies, with service Robert Wallace Wiley
1993-02-11 Order on motion for leave to intervene, With service
1993-02-08 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, of Robert Wallace Wiley David Angelo Grant
1993-02-08 Affidavit, 2 copies; David J. Hughes Robert Wallace Wiley
1993-02-08 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, and to file writen argument and make oral argument limited to 15 minutes., So
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-02-08 Hearing of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-02-08, and to file writen argument and make oral argument limited to 15 minutes., So
1993-02-08 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-02-08, and to file writen argument and make oral argument limited to 15 minutes., So
1993-02-08 Motion for leave to intervene, 2 copies Robert Wallace Wiley
1993-02-03 Respondent's factum, 24 copies, with service David Angelo Grant
1993-01-27 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, of Robert Wallace Wiley Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-25 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-01-20 Notice of hearing Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-04 Notice of constitutional question(s), With service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-29 Order on motion to state a constitutional question, With service
1992-12-22 Decision on the motion to state a constitutional question, for Constitutional Questions see file or Registrar red book #9 @p.69. Interventions by Jan/25/1993, CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-12-22 Hearing of the motion to state a constitutional question, 1992-12-22, for Constitutional Questions see file or Registrar red book #9 @p.69. Interventions by Jan/25/1993, CJ
1992-12-22 Submission of motion to state a constitutional question, 1992-12-22, for Constitutional Questions see file or Registrar red book #9 @p.69. Interventions by Jan/25/1993, CJ
1992-12-21 Motion to state a constitutional question, With service David Angelo Grant
1992-12-21 General proceeding, AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-17 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-12-17 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Deputy Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa,ON)
1992-12-17 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ McL Ia, The application for leave to appeal is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-12-17 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-12-17, CJ McL Ia
1992-12-17 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-12-17, CJ McL Ia
1992-12-10 Decision on motion to expedite the appeal, to the January 1993 session., CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-12-10 Hearing of motion to expedite the appeal, 1992-12-10, to the January 1993 session., CJ
1992-12-10 Submission of motion to expedite the appeal, 1992-12-10, to the January 1993 session., CJ
1992-12-10 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum to Dec/07/1992., CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-12-10 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-12-10, to serve and file the appellant's factum to Dec/07/1992., CJ
1992-12-10 Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-12-10, to serve and file the appellant's factum to Dec/07/1992., CJ
1992-12-10 Decision on motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-12-10 Hearing of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1992-12-10, CJ
1992-12-10 Submission of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1992-12-10, CJ
1992-12-10 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ McL I
1992-12-09 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of Robert Frater to advise the Court that the A.G. of Canada does not intend to file a reply on the application for leave
1992-12-08 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) of Henry S. Brown re factum of appellant written "as if" application for leave granted
1992-12-08 Response to motion to extend time, for filing the appellant's factum to Dec. 7, 1992 David Angelo Grant
1992-12-08 Response to motion to expedite the appeal, for the term commencing January 25, 1993 David Angelo Grant
1992-12-08 Response to motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause David Angelo Grant
1992-12-07 Appellant's factum, 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-04 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service David Angelo Grant
1992-12-04 Affidavit, (of S. David Frankel) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-04 Affidavit, (of S. David Frankel) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-04 Affidavit, to file the appellant's factum (of S. David Frankel) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-03 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Robert Frater; re: motions A330-A070-A270
1992-12-03 Motion to expedite the appeal, of the factum, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-03 Motion to extend time, to file the factum, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-03 Motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show cause, With service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-30 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1993-01-25
1992-11-24 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, to Nov/18/1992, L'HD
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-11-24 Hearing of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1992-11-24, to Nov/18/1992, L'HD
1992-11-24 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1992-11-24, to Nov/18/1992, L'HD
1992-11-23 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gowling; re: respondent is opposed to the Crown filing its factum
1992-11-20 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of Robert Frater to confirm that the A.G. of Can. does not intend the filing of the application to delay the inscription of the case for next term. He expects to file the factum on the appeal on or about December 4, 1992 whether or not the application has
1992-11-19 Service, copy of the application for leave
1992-11-18 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, Completed on: 1992-11-18 Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-18 Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, 2 copies David Angelo Grant
1992-11-18 Affidavit, 2 copies; S. David Frankel, Q.C., with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-18 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, 2 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-18 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gowling, Strathy & Henderson; re: have been retained as Ottawa agents
1992-08-11 Certified casebook Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-10 Case on appeal, 23 copies Her Majesty the Queen
1992-07-13 Service, copy of the notice of appeal
1992-06-22 $30.00 filing fee, (deducted from Justice account) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-06-22 Notice of appeal, 3 copies Her Majesty the Queen

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Grant, David Angelo Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Wiley, Robert Wallace Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
S. David Frankel, Q.C.
Attorney General of Canada
900 - 840 Howe St
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6Z 2S9
Telephone: (604) 666-0211
FAX: (604) 666-1599
Agent
Robert Frater
Attorney General of Canada, Department of Justice Canada
East Memorial Bldg, Service Centre
284 Wellington St 2nd Fl
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 957-4763
FAX: (613) 941-7865
Email: robert.frater@justice.gc.ca

Party: Grant, David Angelo

Counsel
David M. Rosenberg
Rosenberg & Rosenberg
671D MARKET HILL RD
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V5Z 4B5
Telephone: (604) 879-4505
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869

Party: Wiley, Robert Wallace

Counsel
Diana C. Cianciusi
Greg Cranston
Greg Cranston
234 ABBOTT ST
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V6B 2K8
Telephone: (604) 688-0495
FAX: (604) 688-0201
Agent
Diana Cianciusi
Hughes & Hughes
604 - 225 METCALFE ST
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 1P9
Telephone: (613) 563-1131
FAX: (613) 230-8297

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

October 1, 1990
Supreme Court of British Columbia

43917

Acquittal: unlawful cultivation of marijuana and possession of marijuana for the

June 2, 1992
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Victoria)

V01301

Appeal dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13